[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Instead of pcase
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Instead of pcase |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Dec 2023 22:20:40 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > But a person who is just starting to look at this code, and reads that
> > function first, is likely to be impeded in starting to reach that sort
> > of understanding.
> >
> I have to respectfully disagree - dotted pair notation is a pretty
> fundamental part of LISP syntax, regardless of dialect.
That is true, but it is not pertinent to my finding that pcase code
confusing. I know what dotted pairs mean, but I was not sure what
they meant in pcase patterns.
Likewise for Eli. It is unkind and unhelpful to lecture him about
what dotted paris are.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Re: Instead of pcase, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/12/01
Re: Instead of pcase, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/12/01
Re: Instead of pcase,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Instead of pcase, Andreas Schwab, 2023/12/02
- Re: Instead of pcase, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/12/02
- Re: Instead of pcase, Emanuel Berg, 2023/12/02
- Re: Instead of pcase, Barry Fishman, 2023/12/02
- Re: Instead of pcase, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/12/02
- Re: Instead of pcase, Emanuel Berg, 2023/12/03
Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/04
Re: Instead of pcase, chad, 2023/12/04
Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/12/07
Re: Instead of pcase, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/12/02