[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned? |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Jan 2024 16:48:03 +0000 |
Fernando Oleo Blanco <irvise_ml@irvise.xyz> writes:
> ada-mode, as it currently stands, requires compiling some Ada code in
> order for it to work. It comes with some helper scripts for that task.
> However, the experience to get it working is not as nice as with other
> packages due to the compilation step. One cannot simply install it and
> just M-x ada-mode...
On this point, I believe it could be improved if `ada-mode' could check
if the necessary programs are installed, and otherwise try to build them
on its own (as other packages do, e.g. pdf-tools). Playing around with
ada-mode today, I just got an error message after error message, having
to guess what packages, dependencies and package managers to install,
that I ended up writing my code in fundamental mode, which I find sad.
--
Philip Kaludercic
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, (continued)
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/09
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/10
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/10
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/10
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/01/10
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Stefan Kangas, 2024/01/10
- Modes in generic-x.el (was: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?), Peter Oliver, 2024/01/10
- Re: Modes in generic-x.el (was: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?), Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/10
- Re: Is it better to add treesitter modes to core?, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/10
Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?, Fernando Oleo Blanco, 2024/01/07
- Re: Ada-mode to be abandoned?,
Philip Kaludercic <=