[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Feb 2024 17:29:07 +0000 |
> Simply because [1] pattern matching is a more
> powerful generalisation, capable of expressing
> case-distinction; [2] in the end it compiles
> down to almost the same code anyway.
Wow. Really _not_ a good reason (IMHO).
Neither of those reasons [1,2] is good.
With that reasoning you'll use `pcase'
_always and everywhere_ - never `if',
`cond', `let', `or', `and',...
Hey, `pcase' can do it all! And it
compiles down to almost the same thing!
"Demain on rase gratis !"
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, (continued)
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Po Lu, 2024/02/08
- Message not available
- Re: Sv: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Arthur Miller, 2024/02/08
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/12
- RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Drew Adams, 2024/02/07
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Yuri Khan, 2024/02/07
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Arthur Miller, 2024/02/07
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/07
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Arthur Miller, 2024/02/08
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/07
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Arthur Miller, 2024/02/08
- RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/06
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Thierry Volpiatto, 2024/02/06
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/02/06
- Re: cond* vs pcase, Barry Fishman, 2024/02/07
- RE: [External] : Re: cond* vs pcase, Drew Adams, 2024/02/07