[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `--with-small-ja-dic`
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: `--with-small-ja-dic` |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:47:43 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:32:21 -0500
>
> Is this option still relevant?
I think it is. It isn't that old, either; see
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2022-06/msg00122.html
which gave its birth (and the following discussion).
> And if is, why is it that it is a compile-time choice rather than
> a run-time choice?
Because it's simpler, and also avoids making the build longer and the
tarball larger.
Why are you bothered by this, may I ask?
- `--with-small-ja-dic`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/14
- Re: `--with-small-ja-dic`, Po Lu, 2024/02/14
- Re: `--with-small-ja-dic`, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/14
- Re: `--with-small-ja-dic`, Po Lu, 2024/02/15
- Re: `--with-small-ja-dic`, Ulrich Mueller, 2024/02/15
- Re: `--with-small-ja-dic`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/15
- Re: `--with-small-ja-dic`, Ulrich Mueller, 2024/02/15
- Re: `--with-small-ja-dic`, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/15
Re: `--with-small-ja-dic`,
Eli Zaretskii <=