Re: Building the igc branch on MS-Windows

[Gerd Möllmann]

Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> In any case, I asked about the downsides of calling igc_postmorten,
>> which I think is crucial to understand for making this decision.  If
>> there are no significant downsides, then doing so is a net win, no?
>
> Isn't the downside that GC will never function again, and become unsafe
> to invoke, after a call to igc_postmortem?  With the result that the
> debuggee will not be usable as an editor, or indeed operate reliably at
> all, after bt is called?
>
>   
> https://memory-pool-system.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topic/arena.html#c.mps_arena_postmortem

Exactly!