Re: Windows 9X without KernelEx

[Po Lu]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> No, I mean a real person who has a Windows 98 system they use, without
> usp10.dll on it.  As I already wrote, I _was_ such a person, years
> ago, and I had usp10.dll on my computer.
>
> I understand that it is easy to remove or rename usp10.dll and trigger
> the problem, but I'm not interested in fixing such "artificial"
> situations.

A fresh installation of Windows 98 from an image of its official retail
CD-ROM contains _no_ USP10.DLL, and Emacs as it is consequently will not
link.  Hardly artificial, I believe.