Re: master 431f8ff1e38: * lisp/imenu.el: Support more values for imenu-flatten (bug#70846)

[Stefan Monnier]

>> What I would suggest is to ensure completion candidates are unambiguous
>> as strings rather than relying on text properties.  Namely:
> Unfortunately, that'd be a step back.  Maybe at least we could document
> limitations that annotations work only by selection.

How about we make them unambiguous by adding text *at the end* (and
only if there's ambiguity)?

The completion code assumes in all kinds of places that the same text
means the same thing, so using the same text to mean different
completion choices will get you in trouble in all kinds of corner (and
not so corner) cases.


        Stefan