[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default lexical-binding to t
From: |
Christopher Howard |
Subject: |
Re: Default lexical-binding to t |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2024 13:28:12 -0900 |
Hi, I just wanted to mention one little thing (feature request?): I noticed
that, if I include this
```
;;; ... -*- lexical-binding: nil -*-
```
in order to purposefully set the lexical-binding to dynamic — I'm a rebel, I
guess — then the mode-line still gives the "/d" a warning face. In my theme,
that shows up as bright red. But if I set it to "t" instead, then I get a "/l"
without a warning color. I don't see why, if I purposely chose dynamic binding,
that Emacs should treat it as a bad thing which I need to be warned about.
--
Christopher Howard
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, (continued)
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Sean Whitton, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Jim Porter, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, John Yates, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Monnier, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Richard Stallman, 2024/11/06
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Richard Stallman, 2024/11/06
Re: Default lexical-binding to t,
Christopher Howard <=
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Kangas, 2024/11/07
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Kangas, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Suhail Singh, 2024/11/08
- Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Stefan Kangas, 2024/11/08
Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/08
Re: Default lexical-binding to t, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/11/08