[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Discuss new features/enhancements or large changes for users in emac
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Discuss new features/enhancements or large changes for users in emacs-devel [was My resignation from Emacs development] |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Dec 2024 23:09:19 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> It doesn't _really_ matter (IMHO) who's
> doing it - even if a discusser is a decider
> (maintainer). What matters is to get the
> discussion viewed (and maybe participated
> in) by a _wider audience_.
I agree completely.
When the topic of a thread wanders from A to B, there's no reason to
blame anyone. It is natural that sometimes discussions wander, and
sometimes this wandering can convert a discussion of fixing a bug into
a decision about features.
When that happens, we should recognize that the topic has changed,
and handle the new topic in the way that it calls for.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Discuss new features/enhancements or large changes for users in emacs-devel [was My resignation from Emacs development],
Richard Stallman <=