[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar
From: |
Yuan Fu |
Subject: |
Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Dec 2024 14:14:07 -0800 |
> On Dec 24, 2024, at 4:36 AM, Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver@mavit.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024, Yuan Fu wrote:
>
>>> On Dec 22, 2024, at 4:44 PM, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Continuing from the tree-sitter maternity thread, I cooked up some
>>>> script to go over each builtin tree-sitter mode, clone the grammars it
>>>> uses, and check whether the font-lock queries are compatible with the
>>>> latest version of the grammar. If everything works fine, the script
>>>> adds some comment in the source file listing the version that was
>>>> checked.
>>>
>>> Oh that sounds very good. This could be a good workaround for the sort
>>> of fast and lose nature of tree-sitter.
>>
>> Great. Do you think the “verified version” comment will be helpful for
>> packagers?
>
> It helps answer the question, “I am building a new Emacs release. Do I need
> to update these Tree-sitter parsers?”.
>
> However, as a parser packager, I also need to answer the question, “This
> parser has released a new version. Can I package it now, or do I need to
> wait for Emacs 30? Emacs 31?”. A static comment in the source code of a
> released version of Emacs will likely be too out-of-date to answer that.
>
> Other ideas:
>
> - Run these checks regularly (from https://emba.gnu.org/, perhaps?) for the
> most-recent Emacs release, outputting a report or webpage that can be
> referred to by packagers.
>
> - Include a function in Emacs that packagers can call themselves to check the
> compatibility of installed parsers. They could run this check every time
> they build an updated parser (either manually, as a part of the package
> build, or as a part of their distribution’s automated CI testing).
I can add another script that finds the latest “version” that’s compatible with
a builtin mode. The comments will be helpful for packaging a new Emacs release.
And the new script can help with packaging new grammar versions with Emacs.
Yuan
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, (continued)
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Peter Oliver, 2024/12/24
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Michael Albinus, 2024/12/24
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/24
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Michael Albinus, 2024/12/25
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/25
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Michael Albinus, 2024/12/25
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Peter Oliver, 2024/12/26
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Michael Albinus, 2024/12/26
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Michael Albinus, 2024/12/28
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/30
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar,
Yuan Fu <=
- Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar, Björn Bidar, 2024/12/24