Re: Validating tree-sitter major modes and grammar

[Dmitry Gutov]

Hi Yuan,

On 25/12/2024 10:39, Yuan Fu wrote:
> > Hopefully we manage to convey well that the "last tested version" is not 
> > necessarily the latest that will work, just the one that we tested.
> Right now the comment says this at the end:
>
> ;; We try our best to make builtin modes work with latest grammar
> ;; versions, so a more recent grammar version has a good chance to work.
> ;; Send us a bug report if it doesn't.
>
> But let me know if it can be improved in some way.

Just a nit, but we could add "too" at the end:

  so a more recent grammar has a good chance to work too.

(I removed the word "version" for easier refilling, but that's 
definitely not neccesary.)

About the paragraph before, just a thought but do we want to use a 
standard phrase like "has been tested":

  ;; c-ts-mode has been tested with the following languages and version:

? Seems a bit more regular for a casual reader, which conveying the same 
meaning. I'm not a native speaker, though.