[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/src/vm-limit.c,v
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/src/vm-limit.c,v |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:05:44 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/emacs
Module name: emacs
Changes by: Eli Zaretskii <eliz> 08/08/24 19:05:44
Index: vm-limit.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/src/vm-limit.c,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- vm-limit.c 3 Aug 2008 09:27:34 -0000 1.26
+++ vm-limit.c 24 Aug 2008 19:05:44 -0000 1.27
@@ -121,9 +121,29 @@
get_lim_data ()
{
_go32_dpmi_meminfo info;
+ unsigned long lim1, lim2;
_go32_dpmi_get_free_memory_information (&info);
- lim_data = info.available_memory;
+ /* DPMI server of Windows NT and its descendants reports in
+ info.available_memory a much lower amount that is really
+ available, which causes bogus "past 95% of memory limit"
+ warnings. Try to overcome that via circumstantial evidence. */
+ lim1 = info.available_memory;
+ lim2 = info.available_physical_pages * 4096;
+ /* DPMI Spec: "Fields that are unavailable will hold -1." */
+ if ((long)lim1 == -1L)
+ lim1 = 0;
+ if ((long)lim2 == -1L)
+ lim2 = 0;
+ /* Surely, the available memory is at least what we have physically
+ available, right? */
+ if (lim1 > lim2)
+ lim_data = lim1;
+ else
+ lim_data = lim2;
+ /* Don't believe they will give us more that 0.5 GB. */
+ if (lim_data > 512 * 1024 * 1024)
+ lim_data = 512 * 1024 * 1024;
}
#else /* not MSDOS */
static void