[Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102232: landmark: you lose.

[Glenn Morris]

------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 102232
committer: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Tue 2010-11-02 20:35:38 -0700
message:
  landmark: you lose.
  * lisp/play/landmark.el (lm-losing-threshold): Correct spelling.
  (lm-human-plays): Use new name.
modified:
  lisp/ChangeLog
  lisp/play/landmark.el

=== modified file 'lisp/ChangeLog'
--- a/lisp/ChangeLog    2010-11-03 03:33:24 +0000
+++ b/lisp/ChangeLog    2010-11-03 03:35:38 +0000
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 2010-11-03  Glenn Morris  <address@hidden>
 
+       * play/landmark.el (lm-losing-threshold): Correct spelling.
+       (lm-human-plays): Use new name.
+
        * play/gomoku.el (gomoku-loosing-threshold): Correct spelling.
        (gomoku-human-plays): Use new name.
 

=== modified file 'lisp/play/landmark.el'
--- a/lisp/play/landmark.el     2010-10-31 14:40:01 +0000
+++ b/lisp/play/landmark.el     2010-11-03 03:35:38 +0000
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@
 ;; its contents as a set, i.e. not considering the order of its elements. The
 ;; highest score is given to the "OOOO" qtuples because playing in such a
 ;; qtuple is winning the game. Just after this comes the "XXXX" qtuple because
-;; not playing in it is just loosing the game, and so on. Note that a
+;; not playing in it is just losing the game, and so on. Note that a
 ;; "polluted" qtuple, i.e. one containing at least one X and at least one O,
 ;; has score zero because there is no more any point in playing in it, from
 ;; both an attacking and a defending point of view.
@@ -352,13 +352,13 @@
 ;; qtuple, thus to be a winning move. Similarly, the only way for a square to
 ;; have a score between XXXXscore and OOOOscore is to belong to a "XXXX"
 ;; qtuple. We may use these considerations to detect when a given move is
-;; winning or loosing.
+;; winning or losing.
 
 (defconst lm-winning-threshold
   (aref lm-score-trans-table (+ 6 6 6 6)) ;; OOOOscore
   "Threshold score beyond which an Emacs move is winning.")
 
-(defconst lm-loosing-threshold
+(defconst lm-losing-threshold
   (aref lm-score-trans-table (+ 1 1 1 1)) ;; XXXXscore
   "Threshold score beyond which a human move is winning.")
 
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@
            (t
             (setq score (aref lm-score-table square))
             (lm-play-move square 1)
-            (cond ((and (>= score lm-loosing-threshold)
+            (cond ((and (>= score lm-losing-threshold)
                         ;; Just testing SCORE > THRESHOLD is not enough for
                         ;; detecting wins, it just gives an indication that
                         ;; we confirm with LM-FIND-FILLED-QTUPLE.