Re: [Emacs-diffs] master e224c94: * lisp/emacs-lisp/seq.el (seq-doseq): Tighten the code

[Nicolas Petton]

Stefan Monnier writes:

>>> +       ;; FIXME: Do we really want to support this?
>>> +       ,@(cddr spec))))
>
>> Why wouldn't we want to support this?
>> It's not only useful, it is also consistent with `dolist'.
>
> I find
>
>    (dolist (a b)
>      (body))
>    c)
>
> much more readable than
>
>    (dolist (a b c)
>      (body))
>
> Especially when `b' is non-trivial.

Ok, but I still like the fact that `seq-doseq' takes the same arguments
as `dolist'.

Now I would either add it back to the documentation or remove it
completely (and bump the version number of seq.el).

Nico
-- 
Nicolas Petton
http://nicolas-petton.fr

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature