[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
emacs-29 2f1269c3331: ; Fix some minor issues in use-package.texi
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
emacs-29 2f1269c3331: ; Fix some minor issues in use-package.texi |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Dec 2022 07:01:06 -0500 (EST) |
branch: emacs-29
commit 2f1269c3331bfe2b570a9238ce52dafb14c3cf7b
Author: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
Commit: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
; Fix some minor issues in use-package.texi
* doc/misc/use-package.texi: Fix some minor issues.
---
doc/misc/use-package.texi | 24 ++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/misc/use-package.texi b/doc/misc/use-package.texi
index d3b6ee99003..7975138bd6f 100644
--- a/doc/misc/use-package.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/use-package.texi
@@ -652,12 +652,11 @@ elisp, GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual}). Further, this
value is fixed at
whatever was determined during compilation, to avoid looking up the
same information again on each startup. For example:
-@c FIXME: the below should use shell-command-to-string, surely?
@lisp
@group
(eval-and-compile
(defun ess-site-load-path ()
- (shell-command "find ~ -path ess/lisp")))
+ (shell-command-to-string "find ~ -path ess/lisp")))
@end group
@group
@@ -739,10 +738,8 @@ function and variable definitions that will:
@enumerate
@item
-@c FIXME: ``within a guard block''? what's that??
Make the byte-compiler happy: it will not complain about functions
-whose definitions are unknown because you have them within a guard
-block.
+whose definitions are unknown.
@item
Define functions and variables that will be used in an @code{:if}
@@ -1684,9 +1681,9 @@ them directly to the developers of that package manager.
Some users might want to byte-compile their init file to make Emacs
startup faster. This is not recommended in most cases, as the
-speed-up is often too small to be worth it, and can lead to confusion
-if the byte-compiled files are out-of-date. If you still want to do
-it, this chapter explains how to do that.
+speed-up is usually too small to be worth it, and it can lead to
+confusion if the byte-compiled files are out-of-date. If you still
+want to do it, this chapter explains how to do that.
@code{use-package} always loads every library that it can while a file
is being byte-compiled. This helps silence spurious warnings about
@@ -1962,7 +1959,7 @@ together with @code{:ensure}.
@end group
@end lisp
-For example, on a @code{Debian GNU/Linux} system, this would call
+For example, on a Debian GNU/Linux system, this would call
@samp{apt-get install foo}.
If the package is named differently than the binary, you can use a
@@ -1976,11 +1973,10 @@ cons in the form of @code{(binary . package-name)}.
For example:
@end group
@end lisp
-On a @code{Debian GNU/Linux} system, this would call @code{apt install
-foo} if Emacs could not locate the executable
-@code{foocmd}.@footnote{For manual testing, you could use the
-@code{executable-find} function, which is what @samp{system-packages}
-uses internally.}
+On a Debian GNU/Linux system, this would call @code{apt install foo}
+if Emacs could not locate the executable @code{foocmd}.@footnote{For
+manual testing, you could use the @code{executable-find} function,
+which is what @samp{system-packages} uses internally.}
@code{:ensure-system-package} can also take a cons where the
@code{cdr} is a string that will get called by
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- emacs-29 2f1269c3331: ; Fix some minor issues in use-package.texi,
Stefan Kangas <=