[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

branch scratch/handler-bind deleted (was 5e002610faf)

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: branch scratch/handler-bind deleted (was 5e002610faf)
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 23:53:41 -0500 (EST)

monnier pushed a change to branch scratch/handler-bind.

       was  5e002610faf (backtrace-on-redisplay-error): Use `handler-bind`

This change permanently discards the following revisions:

  discards  5e002610faf (backtrace-on-redisplay-error): Use `handler-bind`
  discards  36c49f1a4cd (signal_or_quit): Preserve error object identity
  discards  2c7be32da92 Use handler-bind to repair bytecomp-tests
  discards  d67bfb6e80d eval.c: Add new var `lisp-eval-depth-reserve`
  discards  b1172c9d2c5 src/eval.c (call_debugger): Don't bind 
  discards  933bc573c60 (macroexp--with-extended-form-stack): Use plain `let`
  discards  453f977d642 misc debug-early.el (incl. debug-early-muted)
  discards  071ea552e6b Add `redisplay-counter` to catched nested redisplays 
and abort outer one
  discards  e7c19f33112 (edebug-format): Make it obsolete
  discards  1fcb76b0465 Allow the `error-message` property to be a function
  discards  2f6f38ddc79 Move batch backtrace code to `top_level_2`
  discards  68c95fc6682 startup.el: Use `handler-bind` to implement 
  discards  8f090cd421d tramp.el: Use `handler-bind` instead of 
  discards  a97a2363e39 ert.el: Use `handler-bind` to record backtraces
  discards  7da237eb092 edebug.el: Use `handler-bind` instead of 
  discards  089c87c61db (eval-expression): Fix bug#67196
  discards  23479891db8 New special form `handler-bind`

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]