emacs-30 861b7864fc4: ; Fix node name in emacs-lisp-intro.texi

[Eli Zaretskii]

branch: emacs-30
commit 861b7864fc4b8319a8f8756f02e9a4cfcc25bbfe
Author: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Commit: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>

    ; Fix node name in emacs-lisp-intro.texi
    
    * doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
    (Lexical vs Dynamic Binding Example): Renamed from "... vs. ...",
    to avoid using period in node names.
---
 doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi 
b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
index 49916235fbf..226ffc823ed 100644
--- a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
+++ b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi
@@ -3774,7 +3774,7 @@ elisp, The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual}.
 
 @menu
 * Lexical & Dynamic Binding Differences::
-* Lexical vs. Dynamic Binding Example::
+* Lexical vs Dynamic Binding Example::
 @end menu
 
 @node Lexical & Dynamic Binding Differences
@@ -3811,7 +3811,7 @@ on the top of the stack, and then executes the @code{let} 
body.  Once
 the @code{let} body finishes, it takes that binding off of the stack,
 revealing the one it had (if any) before the @code{let} expression.
 
-@node Lexical vs. Dynamic Binding Example
+@node Lexical vs Dynamic Binding Example
 @unnumberedsubsubsec Example of Lexical vs. Dynamic Binding
 In some cases, both lexical and dynamic binding behave identically.
 However, in other cases, they can change the meaning of your program.