[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#67220: 30.0.50; ERC 5.6: Prefer parameter-driven MODE processing
From: |
J.P. |
Subject: |
Re: bug#67220: 30.0.50; ERC 5.6: Prefer parameter-driven MODE processing in ERC |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:21:29 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
"J.P." <jp@neverwas.me> writes:
> Tags: patch
>
> In the early days of IRC, parsing a "MODE" command from the server was
> comparatively straightforward. There were a few well known letters, some
> taking a single argument, and a standard set of status prefixes. But
> somewhere along the line, things got more complicated, and it seems ERC
> never got the memo. While it may appear obvious that sticking to a
> hard-coded, heuristics based approach doesn't really accommodate ERC's
> core tenet of extensibility, the risk of shifting toward something more
> parameter driven was probably never justifiable without a vocal demand.
In the initial set of changes, I only partially implemented PREFIX-aware
channel-membership handling (here and in bug#67677, for the formatting
side). The main reason for this omission was that I mistakenly assumed
the lack of a valid use case for doing so. However, a latent clue in our
own test suite attesting to the contrary was staring me in the face the
whole time (until I unceremoniously erased it [1]). Since then, I've
come around on this and now think we might as well see it through the
somewhat arduous last mile. See attached.
Thanks.
[1] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=4939f413
^ Grep for "Yqaohv".
0001-5.6-Actually-derive-channel-membership-from-PREFIX-i.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: bug#67220: 30.0.50; ERC 5.6: Prefer parameter-driven MODE processing in ERC,
J.P. <=