[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] counter-intuitive key bindings
From: |
Adam Spiers |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] counter-intuitive key bindings |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:22:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) |
Carsten Dominik (address@hidden) wrote:
> On Jul 28, 2007, at 14:52, Adam Spiers wrote:
> >On a related topic, if I have S-{left,right} on my org-disputed-keys
> >list, this breaks using them for changing a timestamp by one-day
> >increments, even though I don't consider that a clashing binding. I
> >guess I am arguing that this is a minor bug with `org-key' being too
> >indiscriminate in when it filters bindings.
>
> Why do you then have these keys on your list? What are you
> using them for? How is org-mode supposed to know in what
> situations you don't what org-mode to use them?
You're quite right of course :-) It's up to me to override them in the
specific maps in which I want them overridden.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Orgmode] counter-intuitive key bindings,
Adam Spiers <=