[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09 |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:34:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) |
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> How about this:
>
> S-up : nil -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] ...
> S-sown : nil -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] ...
Yes, the general scheme looks fine to me.
The only thing that still tickles me here is that the *default* priority
is not the *easiest* to assign. So why not this:
S-up : nil -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil...
S-sown : nil -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil...
As obvious, the problem in this case is that different keys first assign
the same (default) priority.
Anyway, I won't linger on this further since anyone seems to be okay
with the proposed solution!
--
Bastien
- [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/15
- [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09, Rainer Stengele, 2007/09/15
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Xavier Maillard, 2007/09/17
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Levin, 2007/09/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Bastien, 2007/09/18
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09,
Bastien <=
- [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09, Nuutti Kotivuori, 2007/09/20
- [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09, Bernt Hansen, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09, John Wiegley, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09, Bastien, 2007/09/20
- Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Rick Moynihan, 2007/09/24
Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Levin, 2007/09/18
Re: [Orgmode] Release: Org-mode 5.09, Levin, 2007/09/18