[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails t
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:29:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) |
"Georg C. F. Greve" <address@hidden> writes:
> and when making "~/Tools/Org/E.org" the default file name, things seem
> to work fine with the one exception that instead of creating the heading
> that was specified as default, it creates a "* Notes" heading.
I cannot reproduce this. Anyway, since the headings defined in the
templates are created once, you can create them by hand for now then
leave the rest of the config untouched.
> If a heading is created, why not creat the default?
It's what Org does for me.
> On changing the file names, I wanted to avoid that, because the file
> names are used in generating the agenda, and I don't want to lose four
> characters in the compact view.
The agenda display also uses the #+CATEGORY property. So that you can
have long-filenames-are-fun.org, if the category for this file is LFNAF
then the agenda will show LFNAF :)
> "Georg's Email TODO Org File -*- mode: org; -*-"
Agreed!
> So I consider that necessity a bug. The user has explicitly specified
> that this is an Org file, remember should not consider itself smarter
> than the user and insist on the file name extension.
Did you try to remember a note with "~/Tools/Org/E" and the string
"-*- mode: org; -*-"? The test is done with (org-mode-p), so the string
on the first line should be okay.
> b) remove file name extension sensitivity for Org mode files, or make
> it smart enough to *actually* read the buffer to see what mode it is
> in, because it should have to open the file to add the item.
This is currently the case.
--
Bastien
- [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Georg C. F. Greve, 2007/09/24
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, John Wiegley, 2007/09/24
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Georg C. F. Greve, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Bastien, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Georg C. F. Greve, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Bastien, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Georg C. F. Greve, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions,
Bastien <=
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Georg C. F. Greve, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/25
- [Orgmode] Re: GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Nuutti Kotivuori, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/25
Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Adam Spiers, 2007/09/24