[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts
From: |
Seb |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:17:43 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian) |
On 2008-06-10, Dominik, C. <address@hidden> wrote:
> I would be happy to dual-license the manual. Does anyone know what
> piece of text I would have to put there? Does anyone know if the
> GFDL prohbits me, the author, to add GPL as a second free license?
> I sure hope not.
> [...]
> To be honest, I have absolutely no clue what it means, and it was
> not my intention to restrict use of the manual in any way when I put
> it under the GFDL. Back then I must have thought that this simply
> it the proper thing to use for documentation.
The GFDL itself is fine, it's the use of Invariant Sections, Cover
Texts, etc that make it not-free as far as Debian is concerned.
But anyway, if you're the sole author, you can definitely move to a
GPL+GFDL dual-license when you so please, but I guess I still need to
add that IANAL...
Cheers,
--Seb
- [Orgmode] GFDL with cover texts, Seb, 2008/06/06
- [Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts, Seb, 2008/06/06
- [Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts, Seb, 2008/06/08
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts, Sebastian Rose, 2008/06/08
- [Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts, Seb, 2008/06/11
- RE: [Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts, Dominik, C., 2008/06/10
- [Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts,
Seb <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts, Carsten Dominik, 2008/06/12
- [Orgmode] Re: GFDL with cover texts, Seb, 2008/06/12