[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Making an index in latex export --- surprisingly difficult
From: |
Robert Goldman |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Making an index in latex export --- surprisingly difficult |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:58:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
On 4/26/11 Apr 26 -4:52 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Robert Goldman <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I was trying to make an index in latex export and found that it was very
>> difficult to make it work. I wonder if this could be simplified.
>> Here's what I had to do:
>>
....
>> 2. put in \index commands (I don't /believe/ #+INDEX works, but I could
>> be wrong)
Am I right about #+INDEX not being translated in the latex back end (it
seems not to work, but it's hard to verify a negative)?
If so, would this be hard to fix? If it wouldn't, seems like that would
be A Good Thing.
....
>> 4. Modify the org-latex-to-pdf-process to
>>
>> ("pdflatex -interaction nonstopmode -output-directory %o %f" "makeindex
>> -o %b.ind %b.idx" "pdflatex -interaction nonstopmode -output-directory
>> %o %f" "pdflatex -interaction nonstopmode -output-directory %o %f")
>>
>> [This was /somewhat/ of a big deal. Suggest we add support for indexing
>> as a built-in option, like bibtex...]
>>
>
> Maybe you can try the texi2dvi option (I think it runs makeindex), but
> texi2dvi did have a bug that has caused problems here in the past:
> that's the reason it's not the default setting for
> org-latex-to-pdf-process. If you run into the bug but still want to try
> texi2dvi anyway, see
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2010-03/msg00032.html
>
> for the fix Karl Berry applied to the development sources.
Once one has makeindex hacked in there (oh, and you've broken the
security!), it works fine, thanks.
>
>> 5. The REAL big deal: edit my texmf.cf file to break the security
>> protection of openout_any=p. By default, makeindex will refuse to open
>> an absolute pathname. But org-mode will only pass absolute pathnames to
>> makeindex (AFAICT). Question: it seems like bibtex should suffer from
>> this same restriction. Has anyone had that problem with it?
>>
>
> I haven't had the problem, primarily because I haven't used bibtex
> through org yet :-) But bibtex should exhibit the same problem: the
> bibtex change predated the makeindex one. Maybe bibtex is only called
> with a relative path (if that's the case, then the same method should
> cure makeindex as well). BTW, ".." is not allowed in the relative path:
> you can only use subdirectories of the current directory.
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>