Re: [O] Bug: Extra space inserted in repeated tasks' date line

[Carsten Dominik]

On Aug 18, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:

> Hi Carsten,
> 
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
>>> Bastien wrote:
>>>> Markus Berlin <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> some time ago I noticed this small bug (small but it keeps annoying me!):
>>>>> an extra space is introduced just before "SCHEDULED"
>>> 
>>> Similar to this, I've noticed that sometimes the SCHEDULED line (or
>>> DEADLINE, or ...) is moved synchronously with the heading when
>>> promoting/demoting, sometimes not.
>>> 
>>> I now found in which cases it does and when it does not: it depends on the
>>> presence of text in the entry.
>> 
>> It depends on the presence of *unindented* text in the entry,
>> and purposefully so.
>> 
>>> So, for example:
>>> 
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>> * The SCHED will be moved
>>>  SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>
>>> 
>>> * This one won't be moved along with the heading
>>>  SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>
>>> 
>>> Because of this text here...
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>> 
>>> becomes, when demoted:
>>> 
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>> * New section
>>> 
>>> ** The SCHED will be moved
>>>   SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>
>>> 
>>> ** This one won't be moved along with the heading
>>>  SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>
>>> 
>>> Because of this text here...
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> 
>> See the variable `org-adapt-indentation'.
> 
> This was left untouched by me, that is set to t (default), with the above
> behavior.
> 
> If I change it to nil, I'm even farer from the behavior I would like to get.
> In this new case:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> * New section
> 
> ** The SCHED will be moved
>  SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>
> 
> ** This one won't be moved along with the heading
>  SCHEDULED: <2011-08-18 Thu>
> 
> Because of this text here...
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> The indentation of both SCHEDULED lines is not changed at all.
> 
> I would like that their indentation would be changed with the heading, even if
> I write all my body text starting in column 0.
> 
> So, this is not currently handled, IIUC?
> 
> The SCHEDULED lines don't have a different status than the "body text" for
> indentation purpose ("follow-headline" or "stay-where-you-are")?


They currently don't - but I see that this might makes sense to do differently.

- Carsten

> 
> Best regards,
>  Seb
> 
> -- 
> Sebastien Vauban
> 
> 

- Carsten