[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow |
Date: |
Sat, 05 May 2012 18:30:08 +0200 |
Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I pushed a fix -- can you test and confirm?
>>
>> I get the following error every time I try to indent:
>>
>> "org-between-regexps-p: Variable binding depth exceeds
>> max-specpdl-size"
>
> If you are in message-mode, please also provide the value of
> `org-fb-vars'
((adaptive-fill-function (quote nil)) (adaptive-fill-regexp (quote \(\([
]*[_.[:word:]]+>+\|[ ]*[]>|]\)+\)[ ]*\|[ ]*\([-–!|#%;>*·•‣⁃◦]+[ ]*\)*))
(fill-paragraph-function (quote message-fill-paragraph)) (paragraph-separate
(quote --text follows this line--$\|[ ]*$\|-- $\|---+$\|^
$\|.*wrote:$\|\(\([ ]*[_.[:word:]]+>+\|[ ]*[]>|]\)+\)[
]*$\|<#!*/?\(multipart\|part\|external\|mml\|secure\)))
(auto-fill-inhibit-regexp (quote [
]*\(|\|#\+\(tblfm\|orgtbl\|tblname\):\))) (paragraph-start (quote --text
follows this line--$\|[ ]*$\|-- $\|---+$\|^$\|.*wrote:$\|\(\([
]*[_.[:word:]]+>+\|[ ]*[]>|]\)+\)[
]*$\|<#!*/?\(multipart\|part\|external\|mml\|secure\))) (indent-line-function
(quote indent-relative)) (auto-fill-function (quote message-do-auto-fill)))
> and try to debug `org-indent-line-function' to make sure
> it stops at the first call of `org-between-regexps-p' (not at the ones
> that may be called inside the `orgstruct++-with-major-mode-filling'
> macro...)
It's the same as the previous bug: when I try to debug
`org-indent-line-function', the problem disappears.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, (continued)
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/05/03
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Bastien, 2012/05/03
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/05/03
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Bastien, 2012/05/03
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/05/03
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Bastien, 2012/05/05
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/05/05
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Bastien, 2012/05/05
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/05/05
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Bastien, 2012/05/05
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Bastien, 2012/05/06
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Eric Fraga, 2012/05/06
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Thorsten Jolitz, 2012/05/06
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Bastien, 2012/05/06
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Eric S Fraga, 2012/05/07
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Bastien, 2012/05/08
- Re: [O] orgstuct++ does not lurk silently in the shadow, Eric S Fraga, 2012/05/08