[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp |
Date: |
Tue, 29 May 2012 15:26:02 -0400 |
Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > ...
> >
> > I haven't gone to gmane looking for the discussion, but if one of the
> > principals involved remembers the reason, maybe they can enlighten us.
> >
>
> I found the discussion on gmane - check the thread starting at
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/45243
>
Having read the discussion, I agree with Nicolas and disagree with Matt
and Bastien :-)
Nick
- [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Samuel Wales, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Samuel Wales, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, suvayu ali, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp,
Nick Dokos <=
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Samuel Wales, 2012/05/29
- Re: [O] Annoying behavior of RET after a timestamp, Matt Lundin, 2012/05/31