Re: [O] "Generic" Source block language specification?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:

> Rainer M Krug <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have in a document a definition of a projection, which is essentially a 
>> text as follow:
>>
>> #+BEGIN_src
>>   +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25
>>           +lat_2=-29.75
>>           +lat_0=29
>>           +lon_0=30.75
>>           +x_0=0
>>           +y_0=0
>>           +datum=WGS84
>>           +units=m
>>           +no_defs
>> #+END_src
>>
>> Now this does obviously not export, as the source block language is missing. 
>> Is there a way that I
>> can get the same formating of the source in the exportes output but without 
>> the syntax highlighting?
>>
>> BEGIN_EXAMPLE
>> END_EXAMPLE
>>
>> is similar, but I would like the block to be formated as the SRC
>> blocks.
>
> Marking the src block as `fundamental' has a drawback.  One can no
> longer have in-buffer fontification of src blocks.
>
> A better option would be to have a custom variable which produces
> black-and-white src blocks on export.  
>
> ODT already has this option.
>
>     C-h v org-e-odt-fontify-srcblocks RET
>
> I am CCing Nicolas, to check whether he would be interested in
> introducing an export knob for this.

I still don't get what is wrong with example blocks (wrt export). Would
someone care to elaborate?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou