[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] new exporter, conditional options according to backend
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] new exporter, conditional options according to backend |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:50:27 +0100 |
Hello,
address@hidden writes:
> 'backend' is in the scope of transcoding functions like
> inline-src-block.
>
> I am currently taking advantage of this, but it is a shortcut rather
> than a necessity.
>
> Is your advice "Don't do that" ?
I would rather say "Don't do that in public code". There's no guarantee
this hack will always work.
As you probably know, the clean way to retrieve the back-end symbol from
a transcoding function is:
(plist-get info :back-end)
INFO being the third argument passed to the function.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [O] new exporter, conditional options according to backend, Ezequiel Birman, 2013/01/18
- Re: [O] new exporter, conditional options according to backend, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/01/19
- Re: [O] new exporter, conditional options according to backend, Ezequiel Birman, 2013/01/19
- Re: [O] new exporter, conditional options according to backend, Jambunathan K, 2013/01/20
- Re: [O] new exporter, conditional options according to backend, Andreas Leha, 2013/01/24
- Re: [O] new exporter, conditional options according to backend, cberry, 2013/01/25
- Re: [O] new exporter, conditional options according to backend,
Nicolas Goaziou <=