[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible? |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:20:55 +0100 |
Hello,
Rainer Stengele <address@hidden> writes:
> Secondly, the :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: property is only followed when doing
> subtree export. It is ignored for buffer export no matter where I put
> the property definition.
>
> Please help.
There is no buffer keyword equivalent to :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: property.
Actually, it may confuse a lot publishing process (e.g. resolving links
between different files).
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, (continued)
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Bastien, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Bastien, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Bastien, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/25
- Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?, John Hendy, 2013/03/21