[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] face-at-point
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] face-at-point |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:32:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
>>> "Nick" == Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Eric Fraga has been prolific in providing solutions to these problems
> > today. In addition to the client side solution ("Use v instead of t")
> > which solves the problem on the recipient's side, he provided another
> > solution (which I have used in the past, but I forgot all about it until
> > I saw Eric's reply to your question in the gnus mailing list) that
> > solves the problem on the sender's side: let gnus-dired-attach default
> > to whatever it bloody well pleases - the attachment cookie it inserts in
> > the mail you are composing is just text (until you hit C-c C-c and then
> > it becomes a "real" attachment), so if the type is not to your liking,
> > you can go ahead and edit it at will (I've stripped out parts of the
> > cookie, so it won't be mistaken as a real attachment - I'm not sure
> > how to quote it so that it won't be recognized):
>
> > ... type="application/octet-stream" filename="~/Desktop/foo"
> > disposition=attachment description=Hunoz>
>
> > to
>
> > ... type="text/plain" filename="~/Desktop/foo"
> > disposition=attachment description=Hunoz>
> yes I have seen his answer, problem with this approach: you have to know
> by heart which is hte correct type.
>
> I never can remember whether it is text/plain or plain/text
>
> mml-attach-file gives you a list of options.
>
Ideally, the /etc/mime.types mapping will take care of things
automatically. But this is a last-ditch opportunity to get it
right. You can always
M-x grep RET plain /etc/mime.types RET
(or jpg, or jpeg, or pdf, or whatever) to verify the correct form. Or
put it in a function and bind it to a key so you don't have to remember the
name of the file.
OTOH, if you send it out wrong, I now know how to open the attachment
correctly using Eric's other solution - the problem has almost vanished
and life is good...
--
Nick
- [O] serious problems with org-8 under Xemacs-21.5.32, Uwe Brauer, 2013/06/14
- Re: [O] serious problems with org-8 under Xemacs-21.5.32, Nick Dokos, 2013/06/14
- [O] face-at-point (was: serious problems with org-8 under Xemacs-21.5.32), Uwe Brauer, 2013/06/14
- Re: [O] face-at-point, Nick Dokos, 2013/06/14
- Re: [O] face-at-point, Nick Dokos, 2013/06/14
- Re: [O] face-at-point, Uwe Brauer, 2013/06/14
- Re: [O] face-at-point, Nick Dokos, 2013/06/14
- Re: [O] face-at-point, Eric S Fraga, 2013/06/14
- Re: [O] face-at-point, Uwe Brauer, 2013/06/14
- Re: [O] face-at-point,
Nick Dokos <=
- Re: [O] face-at-point, Michael Sperber, 2013/06/15
- [O] [partically solved] (was: serious problems with org-8 under Xemacs-21.5.32), Uwe Brauer, 2013/06/14
- Re: [O] serious problems with org-8 under Xemacs-21.5.32, Eric S Fraga, 2013/06/14