[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow
From: |
Eric Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 09:44:41 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Grant Rettke <address@hidden> writes:
> I still want to be using org,, so my plan for now then is to write a
> pre-processing script for before org-babel-tangle is run that:
>
> 1. Checks each headline
> 2. Checks if there is a source block
> 3. If that source block doesn't have a noweb-ref name, and there is
> another source block under that
> headline, then "merge" it with the next source block of the same
> nature in that heading.
>
> That is off the top of my head, and I will try it by hand, first and
> see if it tangles the same result.
>
> Thoughts?
Perhaps an easier workaround would be to customize the value of
`org-babel-common-header-args-w-values'. This variable determines which
header arguments are checked for in properties. If you remove all
header arguments from this variable which you know are not used in a
property, it may dramatically speed up tangle time.
This may reduce the utility of some convenience functions, but should
not have too large of an impact on overall functionality.
Best,
Eric
--
Eric Schulte
https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
PGP: 0x614CA05D (see https://u.fsf.org/yw)
- [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/17
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Aaron Ecay, 2014/06/17
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Sebastien Vauban, 2014/06/18
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Eric Schulte, 2014/06/18
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/18
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow,
Eric Schulte <=
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/19
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/19
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/20
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Grant Rettke, 2014/06/18
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Nick Dokos, 2014/06/17
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Thorsten Jolitz, 2014/06/18
- Re: [O] Discussion request: 15m tangle time, details follow, Andreas Leha, 2014/06/18