[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Collecting unique selling proposition (USP) of Org-mode
|
From: |
Thorsten Jolitz |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] Collecting unique selling proposition (USP) of Org-mode |
|
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:14:10 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
M <address@hidden> writes:
>> Von: Karl Voit <address@hidden>
>> Organisation: www.karl-voit.at
>> Antworten an: Karl Voit <address@hidden>
>> Datum: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 21:07:32 +0200
>> An: <address@hidden>
>> Betreff: Re: [O] Collecting unique selling proposition (USP) of Org-mode
>>
>>> I think the best thing to compare different tools is making a list with
>>> features and mark which tools support which ones.
>>> I assume there is already such a list
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_personal_information_managers
>
> OK, the list is there, but it is not comparing features directly.
>
> A very good example is the features comparison of docear with some of its
> alternatives:
> http://www.docear.org/2014/01/15/comprehensive-comparison-of-reference-manag
> ers-mendeley-vs-zotero-vs-docear/
#+begin_quote
A while ago, Mendeley was acquired by Elsevier for an estimated
69-100 Million Dollars.
#+end_quote
wow
If Org-mode is better than Mendeley (which I don't know at all), then
its worth a fortune ;)
--
cheers,
Thorsten