Re: [O] Evaluating inline source blocks on export issue

[Grant Rettke]

Thanks for looking Thomas and Nick.

When I set this and export

,----
| (setq org-export-babel-evaluate t)
`----

I get the expected result of

,----
| Here is a `16', stuck in the middle of some prose.
`----

But when I do this and export

,----
| (setq org-export-babel-evaluate 'inline-only)
`----

I get this output which is not what I expected

,----
| Here is a , stuck in the middle of some prose.
`----

I thought that I was enabling inline code block execution correctly
and making the inline call correctly.

How does it look should it be doing what I had wanted?

I have not yet begun trimming down my org initialization, and trying
to decide when I need to start narrowing things down by deduction.
Grant Rettke | ACM, ASA, FSF, IEEE, SIAM
address@hidden | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
“Wisdom begins in wonder.” --Socrates
((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
“Life has become immeasurably better since I have been forced to stop
taking it seriously.” --Thompson


On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Nick Dokos <address@hidden> wrote:
> Grant Rettke <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Good evening,
>>
>> From [org-scraps] I pasted this example into a buffer:
>>
>> ,—-
>> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>>
>>  #+name: square
>>  #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var it=0
>>
>>  (* it it)
>>  #+end_src
>>
>>  Here is a call_square(it=4), stuck in the middle of some prose.
>> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>> `—-
>>
>> When I export the buffer I get:
>>
>> ,—-
>> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>>  ╭────
>>  │   (* it it)
>>  ╰────
>>
>>  Here is a , stuck in the middle of some prose.
>> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
>> `—-
>>
>> I expected a 16 to have appeared there.
>>
>
> The following works for me:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>  #+name: square
>  #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var it=0 :exports none
>  (* it it)
>  #+end_src
>
>  Here is a call_square(it=4), stuck in the middle of some prose.
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> --
> Nick
>
>