[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ....
From: |
Jacek Generowicz |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development .... |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:17:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.9.6pre2; emacs 24.3.50.1 |
Sean Escriva <address@hidden> writes:
>>> https://cordova.apache.org/
>> http://kivy.org
> From the little experience I have with them, cross platform frameworks
> do suffer from a loss of fidelity compared to native applications but
> as mentioned that may be an acceptable trade off.
We are talking about interfacing to org-mode, an Emacs mode: I don't
think that the target audience is one which excessively values
platform-specific look-and-feel and has an insurmountable aversion to
idiosyncratic interfaces :-)
> There's tons of options for possible paths here
Do you have a decent resource for seeking them out? I found good ones
surprisingly difficult to find.
> (even https://wukix.com/mocl for fellow LISPers) but the key in my
> mind is to support a community of contributors.
Yes, I almost mentioned Mocl along with Kivy, but two things stopped me:
+ Mocl is not free, which will not help increase the number of
contributors,
+ I get the feeling that the average org-mode user is even less Lispy
than your average Emacs user, Elisp notwithstanding.
>>> Unfortunately, due to other existing commitments, i wouldn't be able
>>> to take point on such a reboot.
>>
>> The dreamer in me thinks this might be the itch-to-scratch that finally
>> motivates me to getting to grips with Kivy; the realist in me is pretty
>> certain that I fall into the same category as you.
>
> Realistically this is the issue in most cases, plenty of well meaning
> help but not a lot of time to do anything. Life gets in the way.
For me, after life getting in the way, by far the biggest barrier to
contribution is the platform-specificity of the projects: I simply can't
be bothered to even think about contributing to something which only be
useful to "half" the potential users.
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., (continued)
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Ashton Kemerling, 2014/08/12
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Alexis, 2014/08/12
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Ashton Kemerling, 2014/08/13
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Jacek Generowicz, 2014/08/13
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Carlos Sosa, 2014/08/13
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Alexis, 2014/08/13
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Alexis, 2014/08/12
Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Jacek Generowicz, 2014/08/09
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Sean Escriva, 2014/08/13
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Ashton Kemerling, 2014/08/13
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ....,
Jacek Generowicz <=
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Henning Weiss, 2014/08/14
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Eric Abrahamsen, 2014/08/14
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo, 2014/08/14
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Xebar Saram, 2014/08/14
- Re: [O] Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ...., Samuel Loury, 2014/08/18