Re: [O] [lint] imagemagick

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Andreas Leha <address@hidden> writes:

> I am not sure about the possible values, though.  babel header arguments
> usually take 'yes' and 'no' as values for TRUE and FALSE.

Which is, IMO, a mistake. Lisp has already some definition of TRUE and
FALSE which is not language-centric.

> Examples are :tangle, :comments, etc. So, I have been using
> ':imagemagick yes' until now.
>
> But on the other hand ':imagemagick no' is not doing the expected
> thing.

I looked at the source and every time, :imagemagick is treated as
a boolean, so "yes" and "no" are equivalent to t.

At least, the declaration seems on par with the source.

Regards,