[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
[O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks) |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:47:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Solution: adjust in between the before and after change functions.
> Patch below. I think there shouldn't be performance problems, although
> it does add yet another flag to replace_range (by the way, I noticed
> that the MARKERS flags is never 0, so it's redundant). I tested with
> the attached bug-23917-match-data-buffer-modhook.el.
Looks pretty good, indeed. More specifically, looks like the better fix.
2 comments:
- I'd take advantage of this change to replace the 0/1 booleans with
false/true [but that's just my preference of bikeshed color).
- maybe we can even adjust_match_data in every call to replace_range
rather than just in the one from Freplace_match.
Thanks,
Stefan
> From a8098080dff5f83f7cbcbec2bc263f9db3b45ad9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Noam Postavsky <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 20:15:14 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH v1] Adjust match data before calling after-change-funs
> * src/insdel.c (replace_range): Add new parameter ADJUST_MATCH_DATA, if
> true. Update all callers except Freplace_match to pass 0 for the new
> parameter.
> * src/search.c (update_search_regs): New function, extracted from
> Freplace_match.
> (Freplace_match): Remove match data adjustment code, pass 1 for
> ADJUST_MATCH_DATA to replace_range instead.
> ---
> src/cmds.c | 2 +-
> src/editfns.c | 6 +++---
> src/insdel.c | 10 ++++++++--
> src/lisp.h | 4 +++-
> src/search.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/src/cmds.c b/src/cmds.c
> index 1e44ddd..4003d8b 100644
> --- a/src/cmds.c
> +++ b/src/cmds.c
> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ internal_self_insert (int c, EMACS_INT n)
> string = concat2 (string, tem);
> }
> - replace_range (PT, PT + chars_to_delete, string, 1, 1, 1);
> + replace_range (PT, PT + chars_to_delete, string, 1, 1, 1, 0);
> Fforward_char (make_number (n));
> }
> else if (n > 1)
> diff --git a/src/editfns.c b/src/editfns.c
> index 412745d..32c8bec 100644
> --- a/src/editfns.c
> +++ b/src/editfns.c
> @@ -3192,7 +3192,7 @@ DEFUN ("subst-char-in-region", Fsubst_char_in_region,
> /* replace_range is less efficient, because it moves the gap,
> but it handles combining correctly. */
> replace_range (pos, pos + 1, string,
> - 0, 0, 1);
> + 0, 0, 1, 0);
> pos_byte_next = CHAR_TO_BYTE (pos);
> if (pos_byte_next > pos_byte)
> /* Before combining happened. We should not increment
> @@ -3405,7 +3405,7 @@ DEFUN ("translate-region-internal",
> Ftranslate_region_internal,
> /* This is less efficient, because it moves the gap,
> but it should handle multibyte characters correctly. */
> string = make_multibyte_string ((char *) str, 1, str_len);
> - replace_range (pos, pos + 1, string, 1, 0, 1);
> + replace_range (pos, pos + 1, string, 1, 0, 1, 0);
> len = str_len;
> }
> else
> @@ -3446,7 +3446,7 @@ DEFUN ("translate-region-internal",
> Ftranslate_region_internal,
> {
> string = Fmake_string (make_number (1), val);
> }
> - replace_range (pos, pos + len, string, 1, 0, 1);
> + replace_range (pos, pos + len, string, 1, 0, 1, 0);
> pos_byte += SBYTES (string);
> pos += SCHARS (string);
> cnt += SCHARS (string);
> diff --git a/src/insdel.c b/src/insdel.c
> index 4ad1074..fc3f19f 100644
> --- a/src/insdel.c
> +++ b/src/insdel.c
> @@ -1268,7 +1268,9 @@ adjust_after_insert (ptrdiff_t from, ptrdiff_t
> from_byte,
> /* Replace the text from character positions FROM to TO with NEW,
> If PREPARE, call prepare_to_modify_buffer.
> If INHERIT, the newly inserted text should inherit text properties
> - from the surrounding non-deleted text. */
> + from the surrounding non-deleted text.
> + If ADJUST_MATCH_DATA, then adjust the match data before calling
> + signal_after_change. */
> /* Note that this does not yet handle markers quite right.
> Also it needs to record a single undo-entry that does a replacement
> @@ -1279,7 +1281,8 @@ adjust_after_insert (ptrdiff_t from, ptrdiff_t
> from_byte,
> void
> replace_range (ptrdiff_t from, ptrdiff_t to, Lisp_Object new,
> - bool prepare, bool inherit, bool markers)
> + bool prepare, bool inherit, bool markers,
> + bool adjust_match_data)
> {
> ptrdiff_t inschars = SCHARS (new);
> ptrdiff_t insbytes = SBYTES (new);
> @@ -1426,6 +1429,9 @@ replace_range (ptrdiff_t from, ptrdiff_t to,
> Lisp_Object new,
> MODIFF++;
> CHARS_MODIFF = MODIFF;
> + if (adjust_match_data)
> + update_search_regs (from, to, from + SCHARS (new));
> +
> signal_after_change (from, nchars_del, GPT - from);
> update_compositions (from, GPT, CHECK_BORDER);
> }
> diff --git a/src/lisp.h b/src/lisp.h
> index 6a98adb..25f811e 100644
> --- a/src/lisp.h
> +++ b/src/lisp.h
> @@ -3516,7 +3516,7 @@ extern void adjust_after_insert (ptrdiff_t, ptrdiff_t,
> ptrdiff_t,
> ptrdiff_t, ptrdiff_t);
> extern void adjust_markers_for_delete (ptrdiff_t, ptrdiff_t,
> ptrdiff_t, ptrdiff_t);
> -extern void replace_range (ptrdiff_t, ptrdiff_t, Lisp_Object, bool, bool,
> bool);
> +extern void replace_range (ptrdiff_t, ptrdiff_t, Lisp_Object, bool, bool,
> bool, bool);
> extern void replace_range_2 (ptrdiff_t, ptrdiff_t, ptrdiff_t, ptrdiff_t,
> const char *, ptrdiff_t, ptrdiff_t, bool);
> extern void syms_of_insdel (void);
> @@ -3994,6 +3994,8 @@ extern Lisp_Object make_temp_name (Lisp_Object, bool);
> /* Defined in search.c. */
> extern void shrink_regexp_cache (void);
> extern void restore_search_regs (void);
> +extern void update_search_regs (ptrdiff_t oldstart,
> + ptrdiff_t oldend, ptrdiff_t newend);
> extern void record_unwind_save_match_data (void);
> struct re_registers;
> extern struct re_pattern_buffer *compile_pattern (Lisp_Object,
> diff --git a/src/search.c b/src/search.c
> index 5c949ad..1b82c94 100644
> --- a/src/search.c
> +++ b/src/search.c
> @@ -2727,8 +2727,15 @@ DEFUN ("replace-match", Freplace_match,
> Sreplace_match, 1, 5, 0,
> /* Replace the old text with the new in the cleanest possible way. */
> replace_range (search_regs.start[sub], search_regs.end[sub],
> - newtext, 1, 0, 1);
> + newtext, 1, 0, 1, 1);
> newpoint = search_regs.start[sub] + SCHARS (newtext);
> + /* Update saved data to match adjustment made by replace_range. */
> + {
> + ptrdiff_t change = newpoint - sub_end;
> + if (sub_start >= sub_end)
> + sub_start += change;
> + sub_end += change;
> + }
> if (case_action == all_caps)
> Fupcase_region (make_number (search_regs.start[sub]),
> @@ -2742,26 +2749,6 @@ DEFUN ("replace-match", Freplace_match,
> Sreplace_match, 1, 5, 0,
> || search_regs.num_regs != num_regs)
> error ("Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks");
> - /* Adjust search data for this change. */
> - {
> - ptrdiff_t oldend = search_regs.end[sub];
> - ptrdiff_t oldstart = search_regs.start[sub];
> - ptrdiff_t change = newpoint - search_regs.end[sub];
> - ptrdiff_t i;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < search_regs.num_regs; i++)
> - {
> - if (search_regs.start[i] >= oldend)
> - search_regs.start[i] += change;
> - else if (search_regs.start[i] > oldstart)
> - search_regs.start[i] = oldstart;
> - if (search_regs.end[i] >= oldend)
> - search_regs.end[i] += change;
> - else if (search_regs.end[i] > oldstart)
> - search_regs.end[i] = oldstart;
> - }
> - }
> -
> /* Put point back where it was in the text. */
> if (opoint <= 0)
> TEMP_SET_PT (opoint + ZV);
> @@ -3102,6 +3089,27 @@ restore_search_regs (void)
> }
> }
> +/* Called from replace-match via replace_range. */
> +void
> +update_search_regs (ptrdiff_t oldstart, ptrdiff_t oldend, ptrdiff_t newend)
> +{
> + /* Adjust search data for this change. */
> + ptrdiff_t change = newend - oldend;
> + ptrdiff_t i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < search_regs.num_regs; i++)
> + {
> + if (search_regs.start[i] >= oldend)
> + search_regs.start[i] += change;
> + else if (search_regs.start[i] > oldstart)
> + search_regs.start[i] = oldstart;
> + if (search_regs.end[i] >= oldend)
> + search_regs.end[i] += change;
> + else if (search_regs.end[i] > oldstart)
> + search_regs.end[i] = oldstart;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void
> unwind_set_match_data (Lisp_Object list)
> {
> --
> 2.8.0
- [O] bug#23917: bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), (continued)
- [O] bug#23917: bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/19
- [O] bug#23917: bug#23917: bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Alex Bennée, 2016/07/20
- [O] bug#23917: bug#23917: bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/20
- [O] bug#23917: bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Sebastian Wiesner, 2016/07/26
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/19
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/20
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/20
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/20
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/20
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), npostavs, 2016/07/26
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks),
Stefan Monnier <=
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Noam Postavsky, 2016/07/26
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/20
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/20
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), npostavs, 2016/07/26
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/21
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), npostavs, 2016/07/26
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/22
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Robert Pluim, 2016/07/22
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), Nicolas Petton, 2016/07/26
- [O] bug#23917: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re: org-capture: Capture template ‘g’: Match data clobbered by buffer modification hooks), npostavs, 2016/07/26