Re: [O] [RFC] Moving "manual.org" into core

[Joseph Vidal-Rosset]

Le sam. 03 mars 2018 à  04:57:33 , Bastien Guerry <address@hidden> a envoyé
ce message:
> The rationale for using org.org (which, I agree, sounds a bit
> childish) is that this is the current convention for naming GNU
> manual is [package-name].[extension].
>
> See emacs.texi, gnus.texi, calc.texi, etc.
>
> If using Org becomes popular, it makes sense to have emacs.org,
> gnus.org, calc.org but I find emacs-manual.org, gnus-manual.org
> calc-manual.org to be cumbersome.
>
> Ok, we're not there yet, I know :)
>
> But still: RMS recently raised the question on emacs-devel of
> whether using .rst for the GNU documentation would be better,
> so using .org for this purpose is not entirely hypothetical.
>
> What people think?  Let's just collect votes on this.
>
> +1 for org.org

I agree. An  expression that is both justified by  a convention and that
sounds silly  or childish, is  like a slogan  that everybody has  fun to
repeat: "org.org" is terrific !

+1 for org.org

Jo.