[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates
From: |
Tim Cross |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]") |
Date: |
Sat, 05 May 2018 12:37:12 +1000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 26.1 |
I guess it is a balancing act. On one level, org's tendency to use
'smart' key bindings in which behaviour/action changes depending on
context is convenient, but on the other hand, I suspect it makes things
more complicated, which usually means harder to get right or maintain.
The C-c , binding is in line with expansion/templates in other modes (at
least in my configuration), so there is little cognitive overhead when I
want to expand "something".
Samuel Wales <address@hidden> writes:
> if there is a block there, you probably don't want to create a block.
> if it is not there, you probably want to create one.
>
> was my thinking. incorrect?
>
> On 5/4/18, Tim Cross <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> won't that conflict with the key binding for block editing mode?
>>
>> Also, I think C-c , is possibly more in-line with other
>> template/expansion commands in other modes.
>>
>> Of course, being emacs, anyone can change it to suit personal
>> preferences!
>>
>> Samuel Wales <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> is there a reason why the binding cannot be c-c '?
>>>
>>> On 5/4/18, Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Hi Neil,
>>>>
>>>> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> How can I see and try this famous C-c C-, ? I'm running:
>>>>>
>>>>> Org mode version 9.1.12 (9.1.12-1-g388254-elpa @
>>>>> /home/neil/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20180430/)
>>>>
>>>> The new structure template mechanism will be part of the next major
>>>> Org release (9.2). You can test it by cloning the master branch of
>>>> Org's repository.
>>>>
>>>> Check https://orgmode.org/manual/Installation.html#Installation
>>>>
>>>> HTH,
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bastien
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tim Cross
>>
--
Tim Cross
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), (continued)
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bernt Hansen, 2018/05/02
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bernt Hansen, 2018/05/02
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Carsten Dominik, 2018/05/03
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), William Denton, 2018/05/03
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Neil Jerram, 2018/05/04
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bastien, 2018/05/04
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Samuel Wales, 2018/05/04
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Tim Cross, 2018/05/04
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Samuel Wales, 2018/05/04
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"),
Tim Cross <=
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Nicolas Goaziou, 2018/05/05
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus, 2018/05/05
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus, 2018/05/05
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus, 2018/05/05
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bastien, 2018/05/08