[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2018 23:08:26 +0800 |
Well, you could associate a reward to that kind of tasks.
For example, you can allow yourself to work half a day.
Alternatively, you can make a task you would like to do (say, watch a
new movie) to be blocked until the unwanted task is done.
"Peter Neilson" <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:03:15 -0400, Bingo <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Le 10 octobre 2018 21:45:53 GMT+05:30, Marcin Borkowski <address@hidden>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> - a warning when my efficiency is lower than a set value, and info
>>> about
>>> how much work I need to do to bump it up to that value.
>>>
>>
>> Nice, but it has an anti-feature. For procrastinators, warnings
>> frequently have negative effects. It can be understood in multiple ways :
>>
>> 1. "What the hell" effect : As Dr Art Marckman tells in the book "Smart
>> Change" , there is a "what the hell" effect where the victim goofs off
>> even more to the extent of giving up a goal if he realizes that he is
>> falling behind schedule, or has goofed off more than was advisable. The
>> solution is to forgive oneself, and not beat oneself up. This warning
>> looks like beating oneself up.
>>
>> 2. Showing how much work needs to be done to catch up goes against some
>> self improvement philosophies. E.g. dividing work into subtasks helps in
>> not getting overwhelmed by the amount of work. Or the recommendation to
>> plan breaks in addition to planning to slog, otherwise the plan to slog
>> becomes overwhelming and procrastinators give up.
>>
>> Of course, if it works for you, go for it.
>
> Sabotage of the TODO list ...
>
> Managing the flow of my own work sometimes runs into unintended sabotage,
> perpetrated by others or by me. The offending tasks are often large,
> incapable of division, and not immediately crucial. For example, somewhere
> in the middle of my list of "Get it done some other time, but not now,"
> tasks is this one: "Repair the International 454 tractor." It rests
> comfortably on that list unless I either (1) need to use that tractor, or
> (2) hear my wife telling me, "Why don't you ever get the 454 running? You
> never get anything done around here! I need to use its bucket, and the
> Mahindra doesn't have one." From that point onward, and my "TODO" thoughts
> about writing, about programming, or about training horses are derailed.
> In case (1) I need to figure out some other approach, like maybe using the
> Mahindra. In case (2) my wife is right--as always--and my tendency is to
> stop doing anything at all.
>
> My org mode TODO list is absolutely no help when I encounter one of these
> show-stoppers. If anything, the list is an additional albatross adding to
> my already encroaching depression.
>
> Maybe I need a brain-wave detector, connecting through emacs-lisp AI code
> to a huge Pomodoro-style graphic display, that will alert me when I am
> goofing off, falling asleep, or practicing mental evasion.
>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool, Ihor Radchenko, 2018/10/11
Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool, Bingo, 2018/10/11
- Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool, Peter Neilson, 2018/10/11
- Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool, Marcin Borkowski, 2018/10/14
- Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool, stardiviner, 2018/10/27
- Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool, Samuel Wales, 2018/10/27
- Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool, Marcin Borkowski, 2018/10/29
- Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool, Samuel Wales, 2018/10/29
Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool, Marcin Borkowski, 2018/10/14
Re: [O] An Org-based productivity tool, Adam Porter, 2018/10/16