[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Jan 2020 12:02:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Adam,
Adam Porter <address@hidden> writes:
> I don't use column view very often, so I may be biased, but anyway: in
> the general context of an Agenda buffer, I don't feel like enabling or
> disabling column view is the most obviously useful or natural thing to
> do, so "C-c C-c" doesn't seem like an appropriate binding to me.
In fact, C-c C-c was already deactivating the column view in agenda
buffer since a long time.
Marco's change just opens the door for more bindings to C-c C-c in
agenda buffer - we added `org-agenda-set-tags' so that the behavior
is aligned with that of C-c C-c in org buffers.
--
Bastien
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Bastien, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Bastien, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Marco Wahl, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Bastien, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Marco Wahl, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Bastien, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Bastien, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Marco Wahl, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Samuel Wales, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda, Adam Porter, 2020/01/28
- Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda,
Bastien <=