[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Footnote definition within a verse block has spurious line breaks when e
From: |
Juan Manuel Macías |
Subject: |
Footnote definition within a verse block has spurious line breaks when exported to LaTeX |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:08:38 +0100 |
Hi,
When a verse block includes a footnote reference, the
corresponding footnote definition is
understood in the LaTeX export as if it were part of the verses.
In other words, every
line in a =\footnote{}= macro ends with the string =\\=, and the
spaces between paragraphs are understood as spaces
between stanzas (\vspace*{1em}). If the text of the footnote
definition contains one or more filled
paragraphs, then the export result is catastrophic.
For example, if we have something like this:
#+begin_src org
,#+begin_verse
lorem
ipsum[fn:1]
dolor
,#+end_verse
[fn:1] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
Donec hendrerit tempor
tellus. Donec pretium posuere tellus. Proin quam nisl, tincidunt
et, mattis eget,
convallis nec, purus.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Donec
hendrerit tempor tellus.
Donec pretium posuere tellus. Proin quam nisl, tincidunt et,
mattis eget, convallis nec,
purus.
#+end_src
in LaTeX we get this:
#+begin_src latex
\begin{verse}
lorem\\
ipsum\footnote{Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing
elit. Donec hendrerit tempor\\
tellus. Donec pretium posuere tellus. Proin quam nisl, tincidunt
et, mattis eget,\\
convallis nec, purus.\\
\vspace*{1em}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Donec
hendrerit tempor tellus.\\
Donec pretium posuere tellus. Proin quam nisl, tincidunt et,
mattis eget, convallis nec,\\
purus.}\\
dolor\\
\end{verse}
#+end_src
Since footnotes are allowed within a LaTeX =verse= environment, I
think
this behavior should be fixed.
I'm wondering if it would make sense to modify the
=org-latex-verse-block= function, in order to "save" the text
formatting
of the footnote definition, something like this (apologies in
advance
for my rudimentary Elisp: what I'm proposing is more of a
concept, or a pedestrian solution, than a actual patch ;-):
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(defun preserve-footnote-definition-in-verse-block (cont)
(with-temp-buffer
(insert cont)
(save-excursion
(goto-char (point-max))
(while (re-search-backward "}" nil t)
(let ((from (point))
(to (save-excursion
(re-search-backward "\\\\footnote{" nil t)
(point))))
(save-restriction
(narrow-to-region from to)
(goto-char (point-min))
(while (re-search-forward "\n\n+" nil t)
(replace-match "\\\\par\s" t nil))
(goto-char (point-min))
(while (re-search-forward "\n" nil t)
(replace-match "\s" t nil))))))
(buffer-string)))
(defun org-latex-verse-block (verse-block contents info)
"Transcode a VERSE-BLOCK element from Org to LaTeX.
CONTENTS is verse block contents. INFO is a plist holding
contextual information."
(org-latex--wrap-label
verse-block
;; In a verse environment, add a line break to each newline
;; character and change each white space at beginning of a
line
;; into a space of 1 em. Also change each blank line with
;; a vertical space of 1 em.
(format "\\begin{verse}\n%s\\end{verse}"
(replace-regexp-in-string
"^[ \t]+" (lambda (m) (format "\\hspace*{%dem}"
(length m)))
(replace-regexp-in-string
"^[ \t]*\\\\\\\\$" "\\vspace*{1em}"
(replace-regexp-in-string
"\\([ \t]*\\\\\\\\\\)?[ \t]*\n" "\\\\\n"
(preserve-footnote-definition-in-verse-block
contents) nil t) nil t) nil t))
info))
#+end_src
Best,
Juan Manuel
- Footnote definition within a verse block has spurious line breaks when exported to LaTeX,
Juan Manuel Macías <=