Re: [PATCH] org-agenda.el: Add a M-, binding for org-priority-show

[Samuel Wales]

off topic, but as a separate change, perhaps the 2 things named
priority could have separate names?

On 12/8/20, Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> wrote:
> [ Sorry, all, for the recent string of duplicate messages from me :x ]
>
> Adam Spiers writes:
>
>> This offers an easy way to check the internal numeric priority
>> used for sorting within the agenda.
>
> Thanks for the patch.  Please include a changelog entry in your commit
> message.
>
>> ---
>>  doc/org-manual.org | 8 ++++++++
>>  lisp/org-agenda.el | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/org-manual.org b/doc/org-manual.org
>> index 5a84a6de6..e914af42d 100644
>> --- a/doc/org-manual.org
>> +++ b/doc/org-manual.org
>> @@ -9891,6 +9891,14 @@ the other commands, point needs to be in the
>> desired line.
>>    Set tags for the current headline.  If there is an active region in
>>    the agenda, change a tag for all headings in the region.
>>
>> +- {{{kbd(M-\,)}}} (~org-priority-show~) ::
>> +
>> +  #+kindex: M-,
>> +  #+findex: org-priority-show
>> +  Show the numeric priority for the current item.  This priority is
>> +  composed of the main priority given with the =[#A]= cookies, and by
>> +  additional input from the age of a schedules or deadline entry.
>> +
>>  - {{{kbd(\,)}}} (~org-agenda-priority~) ::
>
> With a C-u, org-agenda-priority calls org-priority-show.  So perhaps
> instead of adding a new binding, the documentation should be improved.
> What do you think?
>
>


-- 
The Kafka Pandemic

Please learn what misopathy is.
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged.html