[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: did behaviour of RET change again?
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: did behaviour of RET change again? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:15:28 -0700 |
there are just a few defaults i think are better for new users,
despite discoverability.
no indentation is one such.
1 changes org files less [better for e.g. merging]
2 requires less filling maintenance [for the body text; bastien's
change works here]
3 requires less adjustment when plain-text changes are made
4 is parseable by third party code that has whitespace line prefixes
in derived formats
another default i'd change is sub-superscript, which has littered
variable_[name as a subscript] all over the web -- even when highly
experienced org users on this mailing list export to html. :)
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, (continued)
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Pankaj Jangid, 2020/12/18
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Berry, Charles, 2020/12/18
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Bastien, 2020/12/20
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Gustavo Barros, 2020/12/20
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Eric S Fraga, 2020/12/21
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Eric S Fraga, 2020/12/21
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Kévin Le Gouguec, 2020/12/21
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Kyle Meyer, 2020/12/22
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?,
Samuel Wales <=
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Samuel Wales, 2020/12/22
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Tom Gillespie, 2020/12/23
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Greg Minshall, 2020/12/23
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Tom Gillespie, 2020/12/24
- Re: did behaviour of RET change again?, Devin Prater, 2020/12/25