[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using lexical-binding
From: |
Kyle Meyer |
Subject: |
Re: Using lexical-binding |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Mar 2021 23:16:48 -0500 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> Any chance you could put this in the `Package-Requires:`?
Sure, added (5263eff5a).
> Note that all the uses I introduced of `with-suppressed-warnings` only
> wrap a very small amount of code, so you could also replace them with
> `with-no-warnings` (added back in Emacs-22).
Good point. I've switched to using with-suppressed-warnings and applied
the patch to master (129c33ddd).
Thanks again.
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Kyle Meyer, 2021/03/04
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Marco Wahl, 2021/03/04
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/06
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Kyle Meyer, 2021/03/06
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/06
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Kyle Meyer, 2021/03/09
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/09
- Re: Using lexical-binding,
Kyle Meyer <=
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Stefan Monnier, 2021/03/10
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Greg Minshall, 2021/03/19
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Greg Minshall, 2021/03/19
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Kyle Meyer, 2021/03/20
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Greg Minshall, 2021/03/20
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Kyle Meyer, 2021/03/21
- Re: Using lexical-binding, Greg Minshall, 2021/03/21