[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations
From: |
Stefan Nobis |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Oct 2021 09:38:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (darwin) |
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Now, if you want to discuss changing syntax for \[...\] and make it
> a block element
I wonder, why it is not a block element. As far as I know, the only
difference (even in the context of Org) between \(...\) and \[...\]
is, that the former denotes inline math and the latter denotes a math
block. And at least exporting to HTML (with MathJax) and LaTeX results
in a block equation for \[...\].
Do you have a short summary or a pointer why \[...\] has been choosen
to be an inline element? What's the advantage or what would be the
downside of making it a block element?
--
Until the next mail...,
Stefan.
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations,
Stefan Nobis <=
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/10/01
- Org syntax: \[ \] as block element instead of inline object, Max Nikulin, 2021/10/02
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Stefan Nobis, 2021/10/02
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Eric S Fraga, 2021/10/02
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Timothy, 2021/10/02
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Eric S Fraga, 2021/10/02
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Max Nikulin, 2021/10/02
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Tom Gillespie, 2021/10/02
- Re: [PATCH] Don't fill displayed equations, Timothy, 2021/10/02