Many thanks to Nicolas and Bruce for their mails and their help.
However, it appears Nicolas' MWE unfortunately does not reproduce the issue. It's not the footnote that is omitted/ not exported, it's the citation in the footnote that is left out (when the footnote follows two or more citations, of which one has a suffix). In Nicolas' MWE, there is no citation in the footnote. What seems to me (being no export on LaTeX) strange about Bruce's LaTeX output is that there is no command \footnote{...} or the like. So is the footnote-part of the LaTeX output real LaTeX? (Sorry for this naïve question.)
I've tested again.
With verbose I get the same erroneous result: the citation in the footnote is not rendered (using the development version of org-mode, see below):
INPUT:
#+LANGUAGE: en
#+latex_header:\usepackage{minted}
#+bibliography_style: plain
#+cite_export: biblatex verbose
# Bibliography (bib file) specified within org-ref-cite in the init file
Body text [cite: @ravlic2021; @saric2010 with a SUFFIX][fn:1]
\printbibliography
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(org-version)
#+end_src
#+RESULTS:
: 9.5
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(emacs-version)
#+end_src
#+RESULTS:
: GNU Emacs 27.2 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.20, cairo version 1.16.0)
: of 2021-06-04
* Footnotes
[fn:1]Test [cite: @senker1987]
LaTeX OUTPUT (shortened):
Body text \autocites{ravlic2021}[][with a SUFFIX]{saric2010}\footnote{Test}
\printbibliography
As a work around I insert a zero width space before footnotes in the context described.