[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0
From: |
John Kitchin |
Subject: |
Re: citations: org-cite vs org-ref 3.0 |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:21:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 28.0.90 |
chris <inkbottle007@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sunday, 20 March 2022 20:44:50 CET Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 9:42 AM Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > For citar, why not simply using ivy-bibtex? It supports org-cite, AFAIK.
>>
>> Not really; or rather minimally.
>
> I use `org-cite` with a very minimal configuration, and it works very well. I
> don't use `ivy` at all. I don't use `helm` at all. Those are very large
> framework and should not be forced to people. (I don't use `org-ref`.)
These days org-ref does not require helm or ivy, and it does not install
them. You can use the core library with any completion backend you want.
It uses vanilla completing-read.
org-ref does rely exclusively on bibtex-completion at this time. I have
not abstracted that out to allow pluggable alternatives like citar.
>
> I only use `citar` with minimal configuration. I use `vertico` for the
> completion. `citar` is simple enough for me to be able to read and understand
> a large part of it.
>
> IMO the more layers of code there are, the more difficult it is to have
> things
> work right. And similarly with the size of the code.
>
> Chris
>
>>
>> Ivy-bibtex supports, for example, inserting of org-cite citations, but
>> not via org-cite-insert.
>
> And I have `org-cite-insert` working straight out of the box.
>
>>
>> So there are currently no org-cite processors for ivy-bibtex etc.
>>
>> Bruce
--
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu
Pronouns: he/him/his