[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [BUG] Unescaped #+ lines in WORG example blocks (was: [PATCH] #+begi
From: |
Tim Cross |
Subject: |
Re: [BUG] Unescaped #+ lines in WORG example blocks (was: [PATCH] #+begin_example lang used in manual and worg (was: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system)) |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2022 02:33:12 +1000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.7.27; emacs 28.1.50 |
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> writes:
> Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> --- a/org-tutorials/org-jekyll.org
>>> +++ b/org-tutorials/org-jekyll.org
>>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ * Creating an org File to be Published with Jekyll
>>>
>>> Below is a short extract from one of my org files showing my setup:
>>>
>>> -#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE org
>>> +#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
>>> #+STARTUP: showall indent
>>> #+STARTUP: hidestars
>>> #+BEGIN_EXPORT html
>>
>> It is not the scope of this patch but looks like missed commas to escape
>> leading "#".
>
> You are right. We need someone to look through worg pages and spot all
> such instances.
> (Help appreciated)
>
Just FYI I plan to go through all the worg files and run org-lint over
them as well as fix up the many problems I've found so far with broken
links, missing images, missing macros, examples not in example blocks
etc. So while I'd appreciate any help on offer, don't worry too much
about fixing some of these as I will get to them eventually.
One area I would definitely like some help with though are those org
files not in english. For example, there is an org tutorial written in
Spanish which is generating bad link errors. Unfortunately, I'm limited
to only one language, so not 100% sure on the right fix (it looks like
examples of how to do links in org, but they are not in example blocks,
so org throws an error when doing the export to html. .
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system, (continued)
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system, Tim Cross, 2022/06/03
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system, Max Nikulin, 2022/06/07
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system, Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/07
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system, Tom Gillespie, 2022/06/08
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system, Tim Cross, 2022/06/08
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system, Max Nikulin, 2022/06/09
- [PATCH] #+begin_example lang used in manual and worg (was: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/09
- Re: [PATCH] #+begin_example lang used in manual and worg (was: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system), Max Nikulin, 2022/06/14
- Re: [PATCH] #+begin_example lang used in manual and worg (was: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/16
- [BUG] Unescaped #+ lines in WORG example blocks (was: [PATCH] #+begin_example lang used in manual and worg (was: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system)), Ihor Radchenko, 2022/06/16
- Re: [BUG] Unescaped #+ lines in WORG example blocks (was: [PATCH] #+begin_example lang used in manual and worg (was: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system)),
Tim Cross <=
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system, Max Nikulin, 2022/06/16
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system, Phil Estival, 2022/06/08
- Re:Re: [DISCUSSION] Refactoring fontification system, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2022/06/09