[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviatio
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Can citeproc be installed without using MELPA? (was: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite) |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:22:05 +0800 |
András Simonyi <andras.simonyi@gmail.com> writes:
>> The problem with parsebib is that it does not even have license
>> (I do not see any in https://github.com/joostkremers/parsebib). If
>> parsebib were a part of Emacs core or at least a part of ELPA, we would
>> also be able to use it in Org core.
>
> looking into the source code (parsebib.el), the library seems to be
> under a BSD-type license.
Then, I am wondering if parsebib can be added to ELPA or at least
non-GNU ELPA. The same can be said for all other dependencies of
citeproc.el and for citeproc itself.
Ideally, users should not need to add non-default package repos just to
add support for CSL in Org.
Best,
Ihor
Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], Alain . Cochard, 2022/07/09
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], Bruce D'Arcus, 2022/07/09
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], Ihor Radchenko, 2022/07/10
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], András Simonyi, 2022/07/12
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], John Kitchin, 2022/07/12
- Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], András Simonyi, 2022/07/12
Re: @string abbreviation in bib file not honored in (basic) org-cite [and a minimal working example with natbib], Alain . Cochard, 2022/07/13