[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine?
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: is it possible to choose a completion engine? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 May 2023 18:26:34 -0700 |
i guess menu selection is a kind of completion and frameworks coud be
used also. a big thing for me that works with ido and ido-hacks and
ido-clever-match is olpath completion for refile-goto and refile.
On 5/22/23, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> wrote:
> webdev@toryanderson.com (Tory S. Anderson) writes:
>
>> Org currently stands out from my workflow because it does completions its
>> own way, with lists and number/letter keys. It would be nice if I could
>> instead have the benefit of vertico, or helm, or whatever else instead.
>> Org would even benefit from marginalia and embark in some cases. Is there
>> an easy variable I'm missing to make org use completing-reads instead of
>> the indexing thing it does?
>
> This is because you customized your tags/todo keywords to have a quick
> key binding to set. By default, Org uses custom "fast" interface for
> completion in such cases. You can either remove the bindings to
> explicitly set `org-use-fast-tag-selection' and/or
> `org-use-fast-todo-selection' to nil.
>
> --
> Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
> Org mode contributor,
> Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
> Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
> or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
>
>
--
The Kafka Pandemic
A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy:
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com